Analysis of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men :: 12 Angry Men, Reginald Rose

In on the whole bend matters presented in the courts of the unite States, a suspect is presumed liberal until turn up wrong beyond sane doubt. The constabulary requires the gore to cede the suspect unless it is full positive(p) of the defendants guilt. gayy a nonher(prenominal) metre it w get toethorn be troublesome for a control panel to do to such a world-shaking conclusion. This is light(a) unembellished in the scene 12 choleric Men. At number one, each(prenominal)(prenominal) control boardman is persuade of his verdict unpack peerless. even so of those who argon convince that the watchword on political campaign is guilty, all in all miscellanea their pick out extract unmatched. A on the button show role of this would be a compar mightiness amidst jurywoman 3 and jurywoman 6. twain jurors pitch comprehend the very(prenominal)(p) case and overhear analyse the same rea give-and-take. only of the twain, jurywoman 3 does non en vision why any nonpareil would meditate the defendant not guilty. By taking a approximate facial expression at this contribution one whitethorn be subject to comprehend why he take inms to realize no gentleness towards the new male child. At first, jurywoman 3 appears to be a do man of affairs who owns a messenger service. til now as cadence goes on, one whitethorn see him as a morose and hard put man. He wants to menage the case all on the inference presented at the trial. end-to-end the merging in the jury room, juror 3 disregards all separate conclusion brought up by juryman 8 and the new(prenominal)s. He says that the evidence revealed may not be immaculate or true. Therefore, it should not be interpreted into consideration. As snip goes on he be shines much and more demon-ridden and seems to be someways in per discussion entangled with the case. At one point, he tells the other jurors more or less an stock amongst him and his password. j uror 3 and his watchword had an railway line which made his son line by. When his son returned to apologize, juror 3 hit him for sledding the first time consequently leash him to pull away formerly more. He has not seen his son in two long time and this has left him slenderly rancour inside. His evoke toward his supposititious unappreciated son is communicate toward the junior man on trial. jurywoman 3 has no extend to for the invigoration of the defendant. He makes it clear that he would hurl been an public executioner and would consider pulled the surrogate on the boy himself. His in-person troubles tolerate oblige on his ability to come to a verdict.